Introduction

Environmental policy fails less often for want of instruments than for want of measurement and compliance. This line examines both. One group of papers builds spatial measurement where official statistics are thin, mapping deforestation frontiers in Central America’s tropical moist forests from satellite imagery, estimating the air-quality cost of agricultural straw burning in China from Landsat-8 data, and tracing the carbon-emission network of aviation across the Yangtze River Delta.

A second group asks whether environmental commitments survive contact with incentives. Chinese carbon markets stabilise emissions even when political oversight weakens, which suggests the market mechanism does work that monitoring alone would not. Corporate ESG disclosure often does not: measuring the gap between what listed firms say and what they do gives a direct estimate of environmental lip service. Alongside these sits a smaller behavioural thread on energy use by building occupants, on food security through insect protein, and on urban green space as a nature-based route to resilience.

A third group turns the same behavioural lens on climate risk in housing markets: a programme on the under-capitalisation of climate risk asks why markets under-respond to hazards households can see coming. Across three UK perils, flood, heat, and coastal erosion, it reads proprietary Rightmove search and listing data to catch the intent to adapt that forms under a hazard’s salience and fades before it is acted on. The finding runs through all three: search reorients but does not convert into moves or capitalised prices, the signal is faint or mis-aimed, and the under-response falls hardest on the exposed and least mobile.

Research Grants

Collaboration network

To be added.

Events

To be added.

Publications

Working papers

Interactive maps